Showing 20 posts in Class Action.
U.S. Supreme Court Rules Employers Cannot Avoid Class Actions By Offering Complete Relief to Plaintiffs
In a 5-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court affirmed the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez, holding that an unaccepted settlement offer or offer of judgment providing for an individual plaintiff complete relief does not moot a class action complaint, resolving a split among circuits. However, the Court limited its holding by declining to address “whether the result would be different if a defendant deposits the full amount of the plaintiff's individual claim in an account payable to the plaintiff, and the court then enters judgment for the plaintiff in that amount.” The Court’s dissenting opinions and concurring opinions suggest actual tender would moot the plaintiff’s claim. More ›
California Employers Beware: cell Phones Present Another area for Class Action Potential
In August 2014, the California State Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit, Division 2) decided in Cochran v. Schawan's Home Service that employers were responsible for reimbursing employees for the business use of personal cell phones. Most cell phone users have unlimited minute plans so the question before the court was whether reimbursement was warranted even if the employee did not incur an extra expense. The answer: reimbursement is always required. The California Supreme Court has denied a petition to review this case so this holding stands. Employers with employees in the state of California should be mindful of this decision and take steps to implement policies which comply with the law (e.g., provide company cell phones, provide for reimbursement of actual cell phone usage for business-related calls, or provide a flat amount of reimbursement per month per employee).
Hinshaw attorneys are available to assist employers implement and enforce such policies.
Must Employers Reimburse Employees for work Calls on Private Cell Phones?
In Cochran v. Schwan’s Home Service, Inc., the California Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District dealt with the question of whether employers are required to reimburse employees for work-related calls made on their personal cell phones. More ›
Rite aid Cashiers can Proceed with Class Action
In Hall v. Rite Aid Corp., the Fourth Appellate District reversed the trial court’s decertification of a putative class of cashiers who challenged their employer’s policy of requiring them to stand while checking out customers.
The case is the latest in a series of California appellate opinions holding that a determination on class certification must focus on the plaintiff’s theory of liability — not the merits of the underlying allegations. More ›
California Restaurant Managers get Second Chance at Class Action
In Martinez v. Joe’s Crab Shack Holdings, the California Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District reversed an order denying class certification to a group of managerial restaurant employees allegedly misclassified as exempt.
The case was brought by lower-level managers at Joe’s Crab Shack restaurants throughout California who complained that they performed many of the same tasks as hourly employees but did not qualify for overtime pay due to their managerial status. More ›
Courts may Certify Class Claims Where Damages Differ
In Benton v. Telecom Network Specialists, Inc., the California Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District affirmed that employee wage and hour and meal break cases may be suitable for class certification even where employees experience diverse damages.
The case supports the proposition that courts considering whether common issues predominate for class certification purposes must focus on plaintiffs’ theory of liability and not on whether class members will have to prove their damages individually. More ›
Certification of meal Break Employment Class Affirmed by Ninth Circuit
In Abdullah v. U.S. Security Associates Inc., the Ninth Circuit held that the district court did not abuse its discretion by certifying a meal break subclass, defined as all past and present employees who (a) worked more than six hours, (b) were not provided a meal break, and (3) were not compensated for the meal break.
Plaintiffs were former employees of USSA, a private security guard company. As a condition of employment, all employees were required to sign an agreement to take their meals on duty, rather then having a meal break. Plaintiffs sought to maintain a class action on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, alleging that the employer’s policy of requiring employees to work through their legally mandated meal periods made USSA liable for paying compensation for missed meal periods pursuant to California Labor Code 226.7 and the applicable wage order. The district court certified the subclass pursuant to FRCP rule 23(b)(3), which defendant challenged this ruling. More ›
It just got Easier to Remove Class Actions
In Rodriguez v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC the Ninth Circuit cited recent United States Supreme Court precedent to make it more difficult for class action plaintiffs to pursue their claims in state court. More ›
Ninth Circuit Allows Parties to Arbitrate Dispute Which had been Litigated for Years
In this recent arbitration decision out of the Ninth Circuit, the employee brought an action against her employer, alleging violations of California’s overtime laws and sought to assert claims on behalf of a class. After several years of litigation, the employee moved to certify a class. The District Court granted the motion in part, narrowing the class which the employee represented. In the same order, the court denied the employer's motion to compel arbitration, which was after the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 131 S.Ct. 1740 (2011). The District Court found that the employer had waived its right to arbitration by litigating the action for years without raising the binding arbitration clause contained in the employee's employment agreement. More ›
District Manager Correctly Classified as Independent Contractor … not an Employee
Barger & Wolen Secures Appellate Ruling
Insurance District Manager Correctly Classified as an Independent Contractor … Not an Employee
By Royal F. Oakes and Michael A.S. Newman
The California Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District (Division Three) recently issued its ruling in Beaumont-Jacques v. Farmers Group, Inc., et al., affirming the trial court’s determination on summary judgment that Appellant Erin Beaumont-Jacques, a former District Manager for five affiliated insurers (“Farmers”) was an independent contractor, not an employee. The case has been certified for publication.
The authors of this article represented Farmers in this case both at the trial court and the appellate level. More ›
Topics
- Equal Pay for Equal Work
- Rest Period
- Wage Order 9
- 24-hour shifts
- ambulance attendant
- meal period
- off-duty rest
- premium wage
- Audit
- automobile sales exemption
- fair reading
- narrow construction
- job classification
- job classification audit
- Temporary Schedule Change
- Fair Workweek Law
- New York City
- Black Lives Matter
- 42 U.S.C. s. 1981
- disparate treatment
- Racial Discrimination
- Severe & Pervasive
- Objectively Offensive
- Subjectively Offensive
- Massachusetts Equal Pay Act
- MEPA
- Attorney General Guidance
- Comparable Work
- Salary History
- Salary Inquiries
- Pay Inquiries
- Self Evaluations
- Florida Civil Rights Act
- Opposition
- Unlawful Employment Practice
- Pregnancy Discrimination Act
- PDA
- Childbirth
- Trans
- Transitioning
- Sex Stereotyping
- 2nd Circuit
- equality
- Zarda v. Altitude Express
- FCRA
- Fair Credit Reporting Act
- Wisconsin Fair Employment Act
- WFEA
- Criminal Conviction
- Arrest Record
- Hiring Policy
- Substantial Relationship
- Protected Speech
- Anti-discrimination Policy
- Anti-harassment Policy
- Diversity
- Diversity Policy
- Social Media Policy
- Electronic Communication Policy
- Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
- SCOTUS
- Securities Fraud
- Student Loans
- Gig Worker
- Gig Economy
- Employer-Employee Relationship
- Borello Test
- Employee
- Exclusive Remedy
- Wis. Stat. ch. 102
- Tort Liability
- Temp Employee
- Temporary Help Agency
- Leased Employee
- Claim for Compensation
- Negligence
- Sarbanes-Oxley Act
- Fraud
- Internal Complaints
- Form 300A
- Annual Summary
- Fines
- Willful and Repeat
- Serious Violation
- Other-than-Serious Violation
- 2015 Inflation Adjustment Act
- Students
- Interns
- Internal Revenue Service
- IRS Notice 1036
- Payroll
- Payroll Taxes
- Social Security
- Supplemental Wages
- Withholdings
- Tax Reform Act
- Tax Cuts & Jobs Act
- Income Tax
- 2018 Withholding Tables
- Joint Employment
- Browning-Ferris
- Right to Control
- Joint Control
- Essential Employment Terms
- Direct and Immediate
- California Family Rights Act
- Parental Leave
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- AB 1008
- Ban the Box
- Department of Economic Opportunity
- compliance audit
- ADA Interference
- 42 U.S.C. § 12203(b)
- 7th Circuit
- Disability Discrimination
- Union
- Union Organizing
- New York Paid Family Leave
- Paid Leave
- NY State Department of Taxation
- Serious Health Condition
- military duty
- Tax Implications
- PFL
- New York Average Weekly Wage
- Obama Administration
- Illinois Human Rights Act
- Emotional Distress
- Workplace bullying
- Extreme or Outrageous
- Salary test
- EAP Exemption
- State of Nevada v. US Department of Labor
- Family Medical Leave Act
- Incentives
- A.A.R.P. vs. U.S. E.E.O.C.
- employer sponsored
- Medical History
- mandatory
- Voluntary
- ACA
- San Francisco Parity in Pay Ordinance
- California Labor Code Section 1197.5
- Fiduciary
- Fiduciary Duty
- Professional Exemption
- Executive Exemption
- Outside Sales Exemption
- Computer Exemption
- Request for Information
- Highly Compensated Employees
- Secretary of Labor
- notice
- Domestic Violence
- California Labor Code
- California Labor Code s. 230.1
- Interactive Process
- Sexual Assault
- Stalking
- PTO
- Paid Time Off
- National Labor Relations Act
- Union Organizing
- Protected Concerted Activity
- Jefferson Standard
- Disparaging
- Labor Dispute
- 8th Circuit
- Vacation Pay
- Vested Rights
- Vacation Policy
- Vacation accrual
- Waiting period
- Pregnant worker protections
- M.G.L. Chapter 151B
- Massachusetts Pregnant Workers Fairness Act
- Employment Contract
- At-will employment
- only when rule
- Wisconsin Court of Appeals
- Department of Homeland Security
- U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
- USCIS
- Consular Report of Birth Abroad
- E-Verify
- Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
- handicap discrimination
- Drug Free Workplace Act
- Hawkins-Slater Medical Marijuana Act
- Rhode Island
- Hiring Practices
- Drug Free Workplace Policies
- Drug Testing
- Gender Nonconformity
- Sick Leave
- St. Paul, Minnesota
- Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Minneapolis Sick and Safe Time ordinance
- St. Paul Sick and Safe Time ordinance
- Child Labor Laws
- Minors
- Minor Employees
- Work Permits
- Street Trade Permits
- Restaurants
- Grocers
- Manufacturers
- Teenage Labor
- Department of Workforce Development
- DWD
- protected class
- protected activity
- Delaware
- pay gap
- compensation history
- Age Discrimination in Employment Act
- Public employers
- private employers
- federal government
- state government
- employer
- RIF
- Reduction in Force
- Circuit Split
- 11th Circuit Court of Appeals
- enterprise coverage
- goods vs. materials
- Aiding and Abetting
- conviction record
- New York State Human Rights Law
- NYSHRL
- Work Schedules
- Fast Food
- Retail
- Fair Workweek laws
- pension plans
- religiously affiliated employers
- church plans
- ERISA section 4(b)(2)
- statutory exemption
- Anti-Retaliation Rule
- Safety Programs
- Workplace Policies
- Injury and Illness Reporting
- Workplace Injury Reporting
- Electronic Reporting
- Salary inquiry
- pay history
- racial equality
- ethnic equality
- fair pay
- Health Insurance
- Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act of 2009
- Fairfax Memo
- American Health Care Act
- AHCA
- ObamaCare
- Trump Administration
- Employer Mandate
- Section 8
- marijuana
- SEC
- Securities & Exchange Commission
- age-based harassment
- disability-based harassment
- sex-based harassment
- sexual orientation-based harassment
- gender identity-based harassment
- Injuctive Relief
- final rule
- webinar
- workplace injury
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Exempt Employee
- Trump
- republican
- administration
- Right to Work
- Affirmative Action
- EEO-1
- Fiduciary Rule
- minimum wage
- executive order
- eeo laws
- cook county
- Section 7
- Unfair labor practice
- strike
- collective bargaining
- permanent replacement employees
- burden shifting
- convincing mosaic
- evidentiary burdens
- bereavement
- unpaid leave
- confidentiality agreement
- employee handbook
- employer policies
- misappropriation
- defendant trade secrets act of 2016
- pay equity
- gender equality
- gay rights
- lesbian rights
- unemployment
- Tipped workers
- Illinois Minimum Wage Law
- Temporary workers
- Employee Benefits
- Penalties
- posting requirements
- constructive discharge
- Administrative Exemption
- Wellness Programs
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- department of labor
- Transgender Rights
- LGBTQ Rights
- administrative warrant
- Confidential Information
- trade secrets
- Unpaid Wages
- Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
- Labor Code
- Discrimination & Harassment
- interference
- Preemption
- National Labor Relations Board
- Shameless
- Criminal History
- LGBTQ
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Medical Marijuana
- EEOC
- Arbitration
- Discrimination
- Agreements
- 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
- Disability & Medical Leave
- Expert
- Joint Employers
- wisconsin
- California Court of Appeal
- Media Mention
- Case Updates
- United States Supreme Court
- Fair Employment and Housing Act
- Opinion
- Independent Contractor v. Employee
- Removal
- Bankruptcy
- Judicial Estoppel
- Quid Pro Quo
- Freedom of Speech
- Exempt Status
- Picket
- Gender Bias
- Immigration
- H-1B
- News
- Affordable Care Act
- Collective Bargaining Agreements
- Eleventh Circuit
- First Amendement
- New Jersey
- Paid Sick Time
- Leave
- Eighth Circuit
- IRS
- Meal & Rest Break
- EEOC
- Nebraska
- Religious Discrimination
- Undue Hardship
- Arbitration
- 6th Circuit Court of Appeals
- 5th Circuit Court of Appeals
- Hostile Work Environment
- New York
- Sexual Harassment
- ADA
- Anxiety
- Disability
- South Dakota
- ADEA
- OWBPA
- Settlement Agreement
- Texas
- Tenth Circuit
- California
- FMLA
- Estoppel
- Retaliation
- Benefits
- Wages
- Mandatory Arbitration
- ERISA
- Non-compete
- Age Discrimination
- Accommodation
- 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
- Electronic Communications
- Texting
- Second Circuit
- Tax
- Wage & Hour
- Class Action
- Ninth Circuit
- Privacy
- SCA
- FLSA
- Volunteers
- Discrimination
- GINA
- Title VII
- Massachusetts
- NLRA
- NLRB
- Bargaining
- Seventh Circuit
- Union
- Undocumented Workers
- Health Care
- Supreme Court
- HIPAA
- HHS
- Wellness
- Harassment
- Supervisor
- Burden of Proof
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Pretext
- Internships
- PAGA
- Similarly Situated
- Termination
- Union Dues
- Class Certification
- Overtime
- Rest Breaks
- Exemption
- Third Circuit
- Fitness-For-Duty
- Multiple Sclerosis
- Labor
- Missouri
- D.C. Circuit
- Fourth Circuit
- CFAA
- Injunction
- First Circuit
- Collective Action
- Meal Breaks
- USERRA
- Federal Contracts
- OFCCP
- Employment Verification
- I-9
- Gender Discrimination
- Title IX
- CAFA
- California Supreme Court
- Legislation
- President Obama
- 42 USC 1983
- Failure to Accomodate
- Reasonable Accomodation
- Employment
- Hiring
- Sanctions
- Sixth Circuit
- Michigan
- Race Discrimination
- Florida
- Workers Compensation
- Corporations
- Standing
- 17200
- Statute of Limitations
- UCL
- Subpoena
- Fifth Circuit
- Travel Time
- Deaf
- Dues
- Class Waiver
- Ohio
- Witness Statements
- Military
- Illinois
- Virginia
- Wrongful Termination
- Religion
- DACA
- Investigation
- Independent Contractors
- Eavesdropping
- Dodd-Frank
- Whistleblower
- Severance
- FICA
- Rehabilitation Act
- Right-to-Sue
- Policies
- Social Media
- Loss of Consortium
- Oklahoma
- Pension
- MSHA
- Medical Examination
- Exhaustion of Remedies
- Election
- WARN
- Title VII Retaliation; Faragher/Ellerth
- Salespersons
- EPA
- Equal Pay Act
- Racial Harassment
- Cat's Paw
- National Origin Discrimination
- Partnership
- FEHA
- Medical Condition
- Background Checks
- Gender Identity
- Georgia
- Ministerial Exception
- FAA
- SSA
- Sex Discrimination
- Education
- Misclassification
- Choice of Law
- Policy
- SOX
- Public Records
- Personnel Record
- Documentation
- Gross
- McDonnell Douglas
- Complaints
- RICO
- Maternity Leave
- Regarded As
- Equal Protection
- ADAAA
- Ledbetter Act
- Recess Appointment
- White House
- California Employment
- Agreements
- Seperation
- DOT
- FMCSA
- Attorney's Fees
- Reporting Time Pay
- Split Shift Pay
- DOL
- Punitive Damages
- Injuries
- Restrictions
- Stock
- Trial
- Verdict
- Back Pay
- Polygraph
- Damages
- LMRA
- VEBA
- Layoff
- Civil Rights
- Defamation
- OSHA
- AMD
- HIV
- HR
- Bankruptcy Code
- Secretary Solis
- Marital Discrimination
- Las Vegas
- Federal Register
- PTSD
- Iraq
- Fourteenth Amendment
- Forum-Selection Clause