Showing 12 posts in Immigration.
The 12 days of California Labor & Employment Series – Day 5 "Immigration Worker Protection Act"
It's the end of the year and while everyone is busy, employers in California should be aware of new laws and regulations that go into effect on January 1, 2018. In the spirit of the season, we are using the next "12 days of the holidays" to blog about one California law a day and that law's impact on California employers. On the fifth day of Christmas, my Labor and Employment attorney gave to me – five golden rings and AB 450. More ›
New Form I-9 Released: Ensure You Are In Compliance By September 18th
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services ("USCIS") published the newest version of the Form I-9 on July 17. The new Form I-9 replaces the version previously released on November 14, 2016. While the changes to the form are subtle, the consequences for employers who do not use the new form to verify the employment eligibility of all new employees by September 18 are anything but. Fines for omissions or mistakes on Form I-9 can range from $216 to $2,156 per form. More ›
Employer Beware: The Time to Use the New Form I-9 Is Now
On January 22, 2017 employers became obligated to use a new Form I-9, dated November 14, 2016. Prior versions of the I-9 form are no longer valid. You can find the new Form I-9 here. More ›
Assessing the Impact of President Obama's Immigration Actions on Employees and Employers
Last week, President Obama outlined his plans for Presidential action relating to U.S. immigration system reform. Setting aside the significant process and procedural controversies, following is a brief summary of some of the most important aspects proposed in this action which may affect your company and your employees. More ›
Strong Medicine: Clinic Owner Found Personally Liable for $1.1 Million in Back Wages after Failing to Pay H-1B Non-Immigrant Physicians’ Required Salary
Between 1998 and 2001, Dr. Mohan Kutty owned and operated a group of five rural medical clinics in rural Florida and Tennessee. Kutty created a formal corporate structure for the clinics, but in practice treated the business as an extension of himself: he and his wife were the sole owners and corporate officers, he personally made all decisions regarding operations, and he maintained no corporate or financial reports. To staff his clinics, Kutty hired seventeen newly-graduated foreign medical students. The students were in the U.S. in J-1 student status; J-1 status allows foreign medical graduates to study medicine in the U.S. but generally requires them to return abroad for at least two years before seeking work in the U.S. An exception to the two-year foreign residency requirement exists, however, allowing foreign medical graduates who have a qualifying job offer for employment in a medically-underserved area to waive the requirement and immediately enter H-1B nonimmigrant status. Kutty’s clinics were in such underserved areas, and so he was able to obtain waiver of the graduates’ two-year J-1 foreign residency requirement and petition for their H-1B status. More ›
Outsourcing Firm Pays $34 Million Penalty to Settle U.S. Prosecutors’ Allegations of Visa Fraud
To B-1 or not to B-1? According to U.S. prosecutors, one company is learning the hard way that it made the wrong choice.
In a record-setting penalty, Indian outsourcing firm Infosys agreed yesterday to a $34 million settlement resulting from what federal prosecutors called “systemic visa fraud and abuse" intended "to deceive" U.S. authorities. By making it appear as if individuals were coming to the U.S. for business meetings when, in reality, they were coming to provide work for U.S. companies, Infosys could use simple B-1 "business visitor" visas for its workers rather than more expensive and time-consuming H-1B "temporary worker" visas. Although Infosys continues to deny any wrongdoing, employers should definitely view this as a symbolic victory for U.S. officials -- visa abuse is being taken seriously and the government wants you to know it. More ›
When Employer Errs, Foreign National may Challenge Denial of Immigrant Visa Petition
In a significant decision for workers currently in the U.S. in an employment-based non-immigrant status (e.g., H-1B, L), the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals held earlier this month that a foreign national may individually seek review of a denial of a green card petition filed on his behalf by his employer. The decision, Patel v. USCIS, No. 12-1962 (6th Cir. Oct. 11, 2013), suggests a new opportunity for employment-based immigrant visa applicants -- if an immigrant visa petition is denied, the alien may request review in federal court even if the employer (or, more likely, former employer) no longer wishes to pursue the visa. Perhaps more importantly, though, the case demonstrates the serious problems that can and often do result from an incorrectly filed immigrant petition. More ›
USCIS Reports that H-1B “Cap” for FY2014 has been Reached and Exceeded in just one Week
In a development sure to embolden proponents of comprehensive immigrant reform, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced that the annual “cap” on H-1B petitions has been reached within just one week of opening the H-1B filing period. Under current U.S. law, USCIS makes 65,000 regular H-1B visas and 20,000 advanced degree H-1B visas available starting April 1st of each year. As a result, in an annual flurry of activity, employers submit their petitions for H-1B workers on or as soon after April 1st as possible. This year, USCIS reports that it had received 124,000 H-1B cap-subject petitions by April 8th. More ›
H-2B Program in Chaos: DOL’s Overreach Leads to halt on most Petitions
The H-2B visa program allows U.S. employers to bring foreign workers to the United States to perform temporary, unskilled, and non-agricultural work. Warm-weather employers across the country — including park districts, amusement parks, and landscaping companies —– rely upon the program to fill out their annual workforce. As of March 22, 2013, however, for reasons explained below, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) has completely halted the processing of most new H-2B petitions. More ›
Customs & Border Patrol Announces New Paperless Form I-94, with Implications for Employers
On March 27, 2013, the Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) issued a final interim rule describing its plans for introduction of a new, electronic Form I-94 Arrival/Departure Record for use at sea and air ports of entry. The Form I-94 is completed by all individuals lawfully entering the United States, and can be used by such individuals as evidence of alien registration, immigration status, and/or employment authorization. The paperless Form I-94 will be phased in at air and sea ports of entry beginning on April 30, 2013; individuals entering by land will continue to utilize paper Forms I-94. More ›
Topics
- Equal Pay for Equal Work
- Rest Period
- Wage Order 9
- 24-hour shifts
- ambulance attendant
- meal period
- off-duty rest
- premium wage
- Audit
- automobile sales exemption
- fair reading
- narrow construction
- job classification
- job classification audit
- Temporary Schedule Change
- Fair Workweek Law
- New York City
- Black Lives Matter
- 42 U.S.C. s. 1981
- disparate treatment
- Racial Discrimination
- Severe & Pervasive
- Objectively Offensive
- Subjectively Offensive
- Massachusetts Equal Pay Act
- MEPA
- Attorney General Guidance
- Comparable Work
- Salary History
- Salary Inquiries
- Pay Inquiries
- Self Evaluations
- Florida Civil Rights Act
- Opposition
- Unlawful Employment Practice
- Pregnancy Discrimination Act
- PDA
- Childbirth
- Trans
- Transitioning
- Sex Stereotyping
- 2nd Circuit
- equality
- Zarda v. Altitude Express
- FCRA
- Fair Credit Reporting Act
- Wisconsin Fair Employment Act
- WFEA
- Criminal Conviction
- Arrest Record
- Hiring Policy
- Substantial Relationship
- Protected Speech
- Anti-discrimination Policy
- Anti-harassment Policy
- Diversity
- Diversity Policy
- Social Media Policy
- Electronic Communication Policy
- Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
- SCOTUS
- Securities Fraud
- Student Loans
- Gig Worker
- Gig Economy
- Employer-Employee Relationship
- Borello Test
- Employee
- Exclusive Remedy
- Wis. Stat. ch. 102
- Tort Liability
- Temp Employee
- Temporary Help Agency
- Leased Employee
- Claim for Compensation
- Negligence
- Sarbanes-Oxley Act
- Fraud
- Internal Complaints
- Form 300A
- Annual Summary
- Fines
- Willful and Repeat
- Serious Violation
- Other-than-Serious Violation
- 2015 Inflation Adjustment Act
- Students
- Interns
- Internal Revenue Service
- IRS Notice 1036
- Payroll
- Payroll Taxes
- Social Security
- Supplemental Wages
- Withholdings
- Tax Reform Act
- Tax Cuts & Jobs Act
- Income Tax
- 2018 Withholding Tables
- Joint Employment
- Browning-Ferris
- Right to Control
- Joint Control
- Essential Employment Terms
- Direct and Immediate
- California Family Rights Act
- Parental Leave
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- AB 1008
- Ban the Box
- Department of Economic Opportunity
- compliance audit
- ADA Interference
- 42 U.S.C. § 12203(b)
- 7th Circuit
- Disability Discrimination
- Union
- Union Organizing
- New York Paid Family Leave
- Paid Leave
- NY State Department of Taxation
- Serious Health Condition
- military duty
- Tax Implications
- PFL
- New York Average Weekly Wage
- Obama Administration
- Illinois Human Rights Act
- Emotional Distress
- Workplace bullying
- Extreme or Outrageous
- Salary test
- EAP Exemption
- State of Nevada v. US Department of Labor
- Family Medical Leave Act
- Incentives
- A.A.R.P. vs. U.S. E.E.O.C.
- employer sponsored
- Medical History
- mandatory
- Voluntary
- ACA
- San Francisco Parity in Pay Ordinance
- California Labor Code Section 1197.5
- Fiduciary
- Fiduciary Duty
- Professional Exemption
- Executive Exemption
- Outside Sales Exemption
- Computer Exemption
- Request for Information
- Highly Compensated Employees
- Secretary of Labor
- notice
- Domestic Violence
- California Labor Code
- California Labor Code s. 230.1
- Interactive Process
- Sexual Assault
- Stalking
- PTO
- Paid Time Off
- National Labor Relations Act
- Union Organizing
- Protected Concerted Activity
- Jefferson Standard
- Disparaging
- Labor Dispute
- 8th Circuit
- Vacation Pay
- Vested Rights
- Vacation Policy
- Vacation accrual
- Waiting period
- Pregnant worker protections
- M.G.L. Chapter 151B
- Massachusetts Pregnant Workers Fairness Act
- Employment Contract
- At-will employment
- only when rule
- Wisconsin Court of Appeals
- Department of Homeland Security
- U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
- USCIS
- Consular Report of Birth Abroad
- E-Verify
- Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
- handicap discrimination
- Drug Free Workplace Act
- Hawkins-Slater Medical Marijuana Act
- Rhode Island
- Hiring Practices
- Drug Free Workplace Policies
- Drug Testing
- Gender Nonconformity
- Sick Leave
- St. Paul, Minnesota
- Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Minneapolis Sick and Safe Time ordinance
- St. Paul Sick and Safe Time ordinance
- Child Labor Laws
- Minors
- Minor Employees
- Work Permits
- Street Trade Permits
- Restaurants
- Grocers
- Manufacturers
- Teenage Labor
- Department of Workforce Development
- DWD
- protected class
- protected activity
- Delaware
- pay gap
- compensation history
- Age Discrimination in Employment Act
- Public employers
- private employers
- federal government
- state government
- employer
- RIF
- Reduction in Force
- Circuit Split
- 11th Circuit Court of Appeals
- enterprise coverage
- goods vs. materials
- Aiding and Abetting
- conviction record
- New York State Human Rights Law
- NYSHRL
- Work Schedules
- Fast Food
- Retail
- Fair Workweek laws
- pension plans
- religiously affiliated employers
- church plans
- ERISA section 4(b)(2)
- statutory exemption
- Anti-Retaliation Rule
- Safety Programs
- Workplace Policies
- Injury and Illness Reporting
- Workplace Injury Reporting
- Electronic Reporting
- Salary inquiry
- pay history
- racial equality
- ethnic equality
- fair pay
- Health Insurance
- Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act of 2009
- Fairfax Memo
- American Health Care Act
- AHCA
- ObamaCare
- Trump Administration
- Employer Mandate
- Section 8
- marijuana
- SEC
- Securities & Exchange Commission
- age-based harassment
- disability-based harassment
- sex-based harassment
- sexual orientation-based harassment
- gender identity-based harassment
- Injuctive Relief
- final rule
- webinar
- workplace injury
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Exempt Employee
- Trump
- republican
- administration
- Right to Work
- Affirmative Action
- EEO-1
- Fiduciary Rule
- minimum wage
- executive order
- eeo laws
- cook county
- Section 7
- Unfair labor practice
- strike
- collective bargaining
- permanent replacement employees
- burden shifting
- convincing mosaic
- evidentiary burdens
- bereavement
- unpaid leave
- confidentiality agreement
- employee handbook
- employer policies
- misappropriation
- defendant trade secrets act of 2016
- pay equity
- gender equality
- gay rights
- lesbian rights
- unemployment
- Tipped workers
- Illinois Minimum Wage Law
- Temporary workers
- Employee Benefits
- Penalties
- posting requirements
- constructive discharge
- Administrative Exemption
- Wellness Programs
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- department of labor
- Transgender Rights
- LGBTQ Rights
- administrative warrant
- Confidential Information
- trade secrets
- Unpaid Wages
- Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
- Labor Code
- Discrimination & Harassment
- interference
- Preemption
- National Labor Relations Board
- Shameless
- Criminal History
- LGBTQ
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Medical Marijuana
- EEOC
- Arbitration
- Discrimination
- Agreements
- 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
- Disability & Medical Leave
- Expert
- Joint Employers
- wisconsin
- California Court of Appeal
- Media Mention
- Case Updates
- United States Supreme Court
- Fair Employment and Housing Act
- Opinion
- Independent Contractor v. Employee
- Removal
- Bankruptcy
- Judicial Estoppel
- Quid Pro Quo
- Freedom of Speech
- Exempt Status
- Picket
- Gender Bias
- Immigration
- H-1B
- News
- Affordable Care Act
- Collective Bargaining Agreements
- Eleventh Circuit
- First Amendement
- New Jersey
- Paid Sick Time
- Leave
- Eighth Circuit
- IRS
- Meal & Rest Break
- EEOC
- Nebraska
- Religious Discrimination
- Undue Hardship
- Arbitration
- 6th Circuit Court of Appeals
- 5th Circuit Court of Appeals
- Hostile Work Environment
- New York
- Sexual Harassment
- ADA
- Anxiety
- Disability
- South Dakota
- ADEA
- OWBPA
- Settlement Agreement
- Texas
- Tenth Circuit
- California
- FMLA
- Estoppel
- Retaliation
- Benefits
- Wages
- Mandatory Arbitration
- ERISA
- Non-compete
- Age Discrimination
- Accommodation
- 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
- Electronic Communications
- Texting
- Second Circuit
- Tax
- Wage & Hour
- Class Action
- Ninth Circuit
- Privacy
- SCA
- FLSA
- Volunteers
- Discrimination
- GINA
- Title VII
- Massachusetts
- NLRA
- NLRB
- Bargaining
- Seventh Circuit
- Union
- Undocumented Workers
- Health Care
- Supreme Court
- HIPAA
- HHS
- Wellness
- Harassment
- Supervisor
- Burden of Proof
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Pretext
- Internships
- PAGA
- Similarly Situated
- Termination
- Union Dues
- Class Certification
- Overtime
- Rest Breaks
- Exemption
- Third Circuit
- Fitness-For-Duty
- Multiple Sclerosis
- Labor
- Missouri
- D.C. Circuit
- Fourth Circuit
- CFAA
- Injunction
- First Circuit
- Collective Action
- Meal Breaks
- USERRA
- Federal Contracts
- OFCCP
- Employment Verification
- I-9
- Gender Discrimination
- Title IX
- CAFA
- California Supreme Court
- Legislation
- President Obama
- 42 USC 1983
- Failure to Accomodate
- Reasonable Accomodation
- Employment
- Hiring
- Sanctions
- Sixth Circuit
- Michigan
- Race Discrimination
- Florida
- Workers Compensation
- Corporations
- Standing
- 17200
- Statute of Limitations
- UCL
- Subpoena
- Fifth Circuit
- Travel Time
- Deaf
- Dues
- Class Waiver
- Ohio
- Witness Statements
- Military
- Illinois
- Virginia
- Wrongful Termination
- Religion
- DACA
- Investigation
- Independent Contractors
- Eavesdropping
- Dodd-Frank
- Whistleblower
- Severance
- FICA
- Rehabilitation Act
- Right-to-Sue
- Policies
- Social Media
- Loss of Consortium
- Oklahoma
- Pension
- MSHA
- Medical Examination
- Exhaustion of Remedies
- Election
- WARN
- Title VII Retaliation; Faragher/Ellerth
- Salespersons
- EPA
- Equal Pay Act
- Racial Harassment
- Cat's Paw
- National Origin Discrimination
- Partnership
- FEHA
- Medical Condition
- Background Checks
- Gender Identity
- Georgia
- Ministerial Exception
- FAA
- SSA
- Sex Discrimination
- Education
- Misclassification
- Choice of Law
- Policy
- SOX
- Public Records
- Personnel Record
- Documentation
- Gross
- McDonnell Douglas
- Complaints
- RICO
- Maternity Leave
- Regarded As
- Equal Protection
- ADAAA
- Ledbetter Act
- Recess Appointment
- White House
- California Employment
- Agreements
- Seperation
- DOT
- FMCSA
- Attorney's Fees
- Reporting Time Pay
- Split Shift Pay
- DOL
- Punitive Damages
- Injuries
- Restrictions
- Stock
- Trial
- Verdict
- Back Pay
- Polygraph
- Damages
- LMRA
- VEBA
- Layoff
- Civil Rights
- Defamation
- OSHA
- AMD
- HIV
- HR
- Bankruptcy Code
- Secretary Solis
- Marital Discrimination
- Las Vegas
- Federal Register
- PTSD
- Iraq
- Fourteenth Amendment
- Forum-Selection Clause