U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Relaxed Standard for Injunctive Relief Under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act
On June 13, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court, in Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney (National Labor Relations Board), No. 23-367, rejected the arguments of the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) to relax the standard that a district court must employ in deciding whether to implement injunctive relief under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act (the “Act”).
The Board had sought a determination that preliminary injunctive relief is appropriate under a two-part test, a more relaxed standard than most courts traditionally apply for awarding injunctive relief.
The Court rejected the Board’s position and precedent from the Sixth Circuit and affirmed in an 8-1 decision that nothing in the Act suggests that a relaxed standard should be applied to Section 10(j) petitions. They ultimately ruled that district courts should use a traditional four-factor test.
What Are Section 10(j) Injunctions?
Under Section 10(j) of the Act, the Board can seek temporary injunctions in district courts against employers and unions to stop unfair labor practices while cases are litigated before the Board.
The Act permits district courts to grant the Board injunctive relief “as it deems just and proper,” but it does not identify which standard district courts should apply when deciding whether issuance of a preliminary injunction is proper.
Previous Standards Used by Circuit Courts of Appeals
Most Circuit Courts of Appeals have adhered to the traditional four-factor standard in determining whether a Section 10(j) injunction was appropriate. However, the Sixth Circuit had a less exacting standard, which the Board asked the U.S. Supreme Court to adopt.
Under the Sixth Circuit standard, the Board would only have to establish that there is “reasonable cause” to believe that unfair labor practices have occurred and determine whether injunctive relief is just and proper. The standard allows the Board to establish reasonable cause simply by showing that its legal theory was substantial and not frivolous.
The just and proper standard, according to the Sixth Circuit, would be established if injunctive relief was necessary to return the parties to the status quo pending the Board’s proceedings in order to protect the Board’s remedial powers under the Act.
The U.S. Supreme Court Adopts Traditional Four-Factor Test
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that when considering the Board’s application for a preliminary injunction under Section 10(j), district courts must apply a traditional four-factor test, which includes a showing that:
- “a plaintiff is likely to succeed on the merits;
- that the plaintiff is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief;
- the balance of equities tips in the petitioner’s favor; and
- an injunction is in the public interest.”
The Court clarified that without a clear command from Congress, courts must adhere to the traditional four-factor test it had previously articulated in Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7 (2008).
The U.S. Supreme Court’s Reasoning
The U.S. Supreme Court noted that when Congress empowers courts to grant equitable relief, there is a strong presumption that courts will exercise that authority in a manner consistent with traditional principles of equity.
The Court stated that a preliminary injunction is an extraordinary equitable remedy that is never awarded as a matter of right. The Court also explained that there is nothing in the text of Section 10(j) to overcome the presumption that the four traditional criteria govern a preliminary injunction request by the Board. When traditional requirements for injunctive relief are not required under a particular law, the Court said there typically is expressed language in the governing statute indicating as much.
In this particular case, the U.S. Supreme Court found the reasonable cause standard advocated by the Board went far beyond simply “fine-tuning” the traditional criteria employed by courts in awarding injunctive relief.
The Court noted that the standard advocated by the Board “substantially lowers the bar” for securing a preliminary injunction by requiring courts to yield to the “Board’s preliminary view of the facts, law and equities.” In fact, the Court noted that under the Sixth Circuit standard, the Board “need not convince the Court of the validity of [its] theory of liability, as long as the theory is substantial and not frivolous.”
The majority opinion noted that “it is hard to imagine how the Board could lose under the reasonable-cause test if courts deferentially ask only whether the Board offered a minimally plausible legal theory while ignoring conflicting law or facts.”
The Court also dispelled the notion that the traditional standard supplants the Board’s role and authority in effectuating a remedy. The U.S. Supreme Court noted that the Board continues to be able to exercise authority to implement the Act, conduct its own proceedings, and enter remedies consistent with those proceedings.
Justice Jackson concurred in using the traditional test requirement but disagreed that district courts are given too much discretion to ignore the underlying purpose of the Act and the Board’s role in enforcing it.
She noted what she called the “dubious history” of over-involvement by courts in awarding injunctive relief in labor disputes. Given the Board’s critical role in the collective bargaining process, Jackson would also afford greater deference to the Board in applying the four-factor test.
How Does the U.S. Supreme Court’s Ruling Impact Employers?
The U.S. Supreme Court ruling is good news for employers as traditional testing criteria will continue to be required before the Board can seek extraordinary relief.
Topics
- #12Days
- #MeToo
- 100% Healed Policy
- 2015 Inflation Adjustment Act
- 24-Hour Shifts
- Abuse
- ACA
- Accommodation
- ADA
- ADAAA
- ADEA
- Administrative Exemption
- Administrative Warrant
- Adverse Employment Action
- Affirmative Action
- Affordable Care Act
- Age Discrimination
- Age-Based Harassment
- AHCA
- Aiding and Abetting
- AMD
- American Arbitration Association
- American Health Care Act
- American Rescue Plan
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Amusement Parks
- Anti-Discrimination Policy
- Anti-Harassment
- Anti-Harassment Policy
- Anti-Retaliation Rule
- Anxiety
- Arbitration
- Arbitration Agreement
- Arbitration Fees
- Arbitration Rule
- Arrest Record
- At-Will Employment
- Attorney Fees
- Attorney General Guidance
- Audit
- Automobile Sales Exemption
- Baby Boomers
- Back Pay
- Background Checks
- Ban the Box
- Bankruptcy
- Bankruptcy Code
- Bargaining
- Bargaining Unit
- Baseball
- Benefits
- Bereavement
- Biden Administration
- Biometric Information
- Biometric Information Privacy Act
- Black Lives Matter
- Blocking Charge Policy
- Blue Pencil Doctrine
- Board of Directors
- Borello Test
- Breastfeeding
- Browning-Ferris
- Burden of Proof
- Burden Shifting
- But-For Causation
- Cal/OSHA
- California
- California Consumer Privacy Act
- California Court of Appeal
- California Department of Fair Employment and Housing
- California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement
- California Fair Employment and Housing Act
- California Family Rights Act
- California Labor Code
- California Legislature
- California Minimum Wage
- California Senate Bill 826
- California Supreme Court
- Call Centers
- CARES Act
- Case Updates
- Cat's Paw
- CCPA
- CDC
- Centers for Disease Control
- Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
- CFAA
- Chicago Minimum Wage
- Child Labor Laws
- Childbirth
- Choice of Law
- Church Plans
- Circuit Split
- City of Los Angeles CA Minimum Wage
- Civil Penalties
- Civil Rights
- Civil Rights Act
- Claim for Compensation
- Class Action
- Class Action Waiver
- Class Arbitration
- Class Certification
- Class Waiver
- CMS
- Code of Conduct
- Collective Action
- Collective Bargaining
- Collective Bargaining Agreements
- Collective Bargaining Freedom Act
- Committee on Special Education
- common law
- Commuting Time
- Comparable Work
- Compensable Time
- Compensation History
- Complaints
- Compliance
- Compliance Audit
- Computer Exemption
- Confidential Information
- Confidentiality
- Confidentiality Agreement
- Constructive Discharge
- Consular Report of Birth Abroad
- Contraception Services
- Contraceptive
- Contracts Clause
- Conviction Record
- Convincing Mosaic
- Cook County
- Cook County Minimum Wage
- Coronavirus
- Corporate Board
- Corporate Compliance
- COVID-19
- Criminal Conviction
- Criminal History
- CSE
- Customer Service
- D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals
- DACA
- Damages
- Deadline Extension
- Defamation
- Defendant Trade Secrets Act of 2016
- Delaware
- Department of Homeland Security
- Department of Economic Opportunity
- Department of Industrial Relations
- Department of Justice
- Department of Workforce Development
- Designation Notice
- DFEH
- DHHS
- Direct and Immediate
- Disability
- Disability and Medical Leave
- Disability Discrimination
- Disability-Based Harassment
- Disciplinary Decisions
- Disclosure
- Discrimination
- Disparaging
- Disparate Impact
- Disparate Treatment
- District of Columbia
- Diversity
- Diversity Policy
- Documentation
- Dodd-Frank
- Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
- DOJ
- DOL
- Domestic Violence
- DOT
- Drug Free Workplace Act
- Drug Free Workplace Policies
- Drug Testing
- Dues
- Duluth
- DWD
- E-Verify
- EAP Exemption
- Earned Sick and Safe time
- Eavesdropping
- Education
- EEO Laws
- EEO-1
- Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals
- El Cerrito CA Minimum Wage
- Election
- Electronic Communication Policy
- Electronic Communications
- Electronic Monitoring
- Electronic Reporting
- Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
- emergency condition
- Emeryville CA Minimum Wage
- Emotional Distress
- Employee
- Employee Benefits
- Employee Classification
- Employee Handbook
- Employee Information
- Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
- Employee Termination
- Employer
- Employer Health Care Plans
- Employer Mandate
- Employer Policies
- Employer Policy
- Employer Sponsored
- Employer-Employee Relationship
- Employer-Sponsored Visas
- Employment
- Employment and Training Administration
- Employment Contract
- Employment Verification
- Enterprise Coverage
- EPA
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
- Equal Pay Act
- Equal Pay for Equal Work
- Equal Protection
- Equality
- ERISA
- Essential Employment Terms
- Essential Functions
- ESST
- Ethnic Equality
- Evidentiary Burdens
- Exclusive Remedy
- Executive Exemption
- Executive Order
- Exempt Employee
- Exempt Status
- Exemption
- Experience
- Expert
- Expression of Milk
- Extreme or Outrageous
- FAA
- Failure to Accomodate
- Fair Credit Reporting Act
- Fair Employment and Housing Act
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Fair Pay
- Fair Reading
- Fair Workweek Law
- Fair Workweek laws
- Families First Coronavirus Response Act
- Family and Medical Leave
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- family planning
- Fast Food
- FCRA
- FDA
- Federal
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Federal Drug Administration
- Federal Government
- Federal Pandemic Unemployment Compensation
- Federal Preemption
- Federal Register
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
- Federal Trade Commission
- Fee Disputes
- FEHA
- fertility
- FFCRA
- Fiduciary
- Fiduciary Duty
- Fiduciary Rule
- Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
- Final Rule
- Fines
- fingerprints
- First Amendment
- First Circuit Court of Appeals
- Flexible Spending Accounts
- Florida
- Florida Civil Rights Act
- Florida's Private Whistleblower Act
- FLSA
- FLSA Exemptions
- Flu Shot
- Fluctuating Workweek
- FMCSA
- FMLA
- FMLA Abuse
- FMLA Interference
- Food Delivery
- Form 300A
- Forum-Selection Clause
- Fourteenth Amendment
- Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
- Franchisee
- Franchising
- Franchisor
- Fraud
- Freedom of Speech
- FSA
- FTC
- Full-time hours
- garden leave clause
- Gay Rights
- Gender Bias
- Gender Discrimination
- Gender Equality
- Gender Identity
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Gender Identity-Based Harassment
- Gender Nonconformity
- Generation Z
- Generational Conflict
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act
- Georgia
- Gig Economy
- Gig Worker
- Good Faith
- Graduate Students
- Grievances
- Grocers
- Gross
- H-1B
- Hair Discrimination
- Handicap Discrimination
- Harassment
- Hawkins-Slater Medical Marijuana Act
- Health and Safety
- Health Care
- Health Care Employers
- Health Care Provider
- Health Insurance
- HHS
- Highly Compensated Employees
- HIPAA
- Hiring
- Hiring Policy
- Hiring Practices
- HIV
- Hostile Work Environment
- Hour Tracking
- Hours Worked
- HR
- Human Trafficking
- Hybrand
- I-9
- IDHR
- IEP
- IHRA
- Illinois
- Illinois Business Corporation Act
- Illinois Department of Human Rights
- Illinois Equal Pay Act
- Illinois Freedom to Work Act
- Illinois Human Rights Act
- Illinois Minimum Wage Law
- Illinois Nursing Mothers in the Workplace Act
- Illinois One Day Off In Seven Act
- Illinois Supreme Court
- Illinois Workplace Transparency Act
- Immigration
- Impaired
- Impairment
- Incentives
- inclusion
- Income Tax
- independent contractor classification
- Independent Contractors
- Indiana
- Indiana Supreme Court
- Individualized Education Program
- informed consent
- Injuctive Relief
- Injunction
- Injuries
- Injury and Illness Reporting
- Interactive Process
- Interference
- Intermittent Leave
- Internal Applicants
- Internal Complaints
- Internal Revenue Service
- Interns
- Internships
- Investigation
- Iraq
- Iris Scans
- IRS
- IRS Notice 1036
- ISERRA
- IWTA
- janitorial
- Jefferson Standard
- Job Applicant
- Job Applicant Information
- Job Classification
- Job Classification Audit
- Job Descriptions
- Joint Control
- Joint Employer Relationship
- Joint Employer Rule
- Joint Employer Test
- Joint Employers
- Joint Employment
- Judicial Estoppel
- LAB s. 226.2
- Labor and Employment
- Labor Code
- Labor Dispute
- Labor Organizing
- Lactation Accommodations
- Lactation Policies
- Las Vegas
- lateral transfer
- Layoff
- Leased Employee
- Leave
- Ledbetter Act
- Legislation
- LGBTQ
- LGBTQ Rights
- LMRA
- Loan Forgiveness
- Local Ordinance
- Los Angeles County CA Minimum Wage
- Loss of Consortium
- M.G.L. Chapter 151B
- Major League Baseball
- major life activity
- Malibu CA Minimum Wage
- Mandatory
- Mandatory Arbitration
- Mandatory Reporting
- Manufacturers
- Marijuana
- Marital Discrimination
- Maryland Minimum Wage
- Massachusetts
- Massachusetts Equal Pay Act
- Massachusetts Pregnant Workers Fairness Act
- Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
- Massachusetts Wage Act
- Maternity Leave
- McDonnell Douglas
- Meal & Rest Break
- Meal Breaks
- Meal Period
- Media Mention
- Medical Condition
- Medical Examination
- Medical History
- Medical Marijuana
- MEPA
- MHRA
- Michigan
- Micro-Units
- Military
- Military Duty
- Millennials
- Milpitas CA Minimum Wage
- Minimum Wage
- Ministerial Exception
- Minneapolis Minimum Wage
- Minneapolis Sick and Safe Time ordinance
- Minnesota
- Minnesota Court of Appeals
- Minnesota Human Rights Act
- Minor Employees
- Minors
- Misappropriation
- Misclassification
- Missouri
- MLB
- Montana Human Rights Act
- Montgomery County Maryland Minimum Wage
- Municipalities
- Narrow Construction
- National Football League
- National Labor Relations Act (NLRA)
- National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
- National Origin Discrimination
- Natural Hair
- Nebraska
- Negligence
- Neutrality Agreement
- New Jersey
- New Jersey Compassionate Use Medical Marijuana Act
- New Jersey Law Against Discrimination
- New Moms
- New York
- New York Average Weekly Wage
- New York City
- New York City Human Rights Law
- New York Court of Appeals
- New York HERO Act
- New York Labor Law
- New York Legislation
- New York Minimum Wage
- New York Paid Family Leave
- New York State Human Rights Law
- News
- NFL
- Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
- NJ DOL
- NJ Paid Sick Leave Law
- NJLAD
- NLRA Section 7
- No Rehire Provisions
- Non-Compete
- Non-Employee Union Agents
- Non-Supervisory Employees
- Noncompete Covenant
- Noncompetition Agreement
- Nondiscretionary Bonuses
- nonproductive time
- Nonsolicitation Covenant
- Notice
- Notice of Proposed Rule Making
- Notices
- NPRM
- Nursing Mothers
- NY State Department of Taxation
- NYSHRL
- Obama Administration
- ObamaCare
- Obesity
- Objectively Offensive
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- OFCCP
- Off-Duty Rest
- Off-the-Clock
- Office of Management and Budget
- Ohio
- Ok Boomer
- Oklahoma
- Older Workers
- OMB
- On-Call Scheduling
- Only When Rule
- Opinion
- Opinion Letter
- Opioid Epidemic
- Opposition
- Oregon Minimum Wage
- Organ Donation
- OSH Act
- OSHA
- Other-than-Serious Violation
- Outside Applicants
- Outside Sales Exemption
- Overtime
- Paid Leave
- Paid Sick Leave
- Paid Sick Leave Law
- Paid Time Off
- Pandemic Unemployment Assistance
- Parental Leave
- part-time hours
- Partnership
- Pasadena CA Minimum Wage
- Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act of 2009
- Pay Data
- Pay Equity
- Pay Gap
- Pay History
- Pay Inquiries
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Payment Disclosure
- Payroll
- Payroll Taxes
- PDA
- Penalties
- Pennsylvania
- Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act
- Pennsylvania Wage Payment and Collection Law
- Pension
- Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation
- Pension Plans
- Pensions
- Perceived Disability
- Permanent Replacement Employees
- Personal Protective Equipment
- Personnel Record
- PFL
- Physiological Condition
- Picket
- Piece-rate
- Policies
- Policy
- Political Affiliation
- Political Discrimination
- Political Speech
- Politics
- Polygraph
- Portland Maine Minimum Wage
- Posting Requirements
- PPE
- Preemption
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Pregnancy Discrimination Act
- Pregnant Worker Fairness Act
- Pregnant Worker Protections
- Premium Wage
- Prescriptions
- President Obama
- Presidential Election
- Pretext
- Preventative Care
- Privacy
- Private Attorneys General Act of 2004
- Private Colleges and Universities
- Private Employers
- Private Property
- Professional Exemption
- Property Rights
- Proposed Rulemaking
- Protected Activity
- Protected Class
- Protected Concerted Activity
- Protected Leave
- Protected Speech
- PTO
- PTSD
- Public Employers
- Public Records
- Publicly-Held Corporations
- PUMP Act
- Punitive Damages
- qualified individual
- Qualifying Exigency
- Quid Pro Quo
- quota
- Racial Discrimination
- Racial Equality
- Racial Harassment
- Reasonable Accomodation
- Rebuttable Presumption
- Recess Appointment
- Reduction in Force
- Regarded As
- Regulatory Compliance
- Regulatory Enforcement
- Rehabilitation Act
- Religion
- Religious Accommodation
- Religious Discrimination
- Religiously Affiliated Employers
- Remote Working
- Removal
- Reporting
- Reporting Time Pay
- Reproductive Health
- Republican
- Request for Information
- Respondeat Superior
- Rest Breaks
- Rest Period
- Restaurants
- Restrictions
- Restrictive Covenant
- Retail
- Retaliation
- retaliatory termination
- Retina Scans
- return-to-work
- Rhode Island
- RICO
- RIF
- Right of Recall
- Right to Control
- Right-to-Work
- Rounding Policy
- Safety Programs
- Safety Sensitive Laborer
- Salaried Employees
- salary
- Salary History
- Salary Inquiries
- Salary Inquiry
- Salary Test
- San Francisco CA Minimum Wage
- San Francisco Parity in Pay Ordinance
- San Leandro CA Minimum Wage
- Santa Monica CA Minimum Wage
- Sarbanes-Oxley Act
- SCOTUS
- Seasonal Workers
- SEC
- Second Circuit Court of Appeals
- Secret Ballot
- Secretary of Labor
- Secretary Solis
- Section 7
- Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act
- Section 8
- Securities & Exchange Commission
- Securities Fraud
- Self Evaluations
- Separation Agreement
- Seperation
- Serious Health Condition
- Serious Violation
- Settlement Agreement
- Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals
- Severance
- Severe and Pervasive
- Sex Discrimination
- Sex Stereotyping
- Sex-Based Harassment
- sexual and reproductive health decisions
- Sexual Assault
- Sexual Harassment
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Sexual Orientation-Based Harassment
- Shameless
- Short-Term Disability
- Sick Leave
- Similarly Situated
- Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals
- Social Media
- Social Media Policy
- Social Security
- South Dakota
- SOX
- Split Shift Pay
- SSA
- St. Paul Sick and Safe Time Ordinance
- St. Paul, Minnesota
- Stalking
- State Government
- Statute of Limitations
- Statutory Damages
- Statutory Exemption
- STD prevention
- Stock
- Stop WOKE Act
- Street Trade Permits
- strike
- Student Loans
- Students
- Subjectively Offensive
- Subpoena
- Substantial Relationship
- Successor Liability
- Supervisor Reassignment
- Supervisors
- Supervisory Employees
- Supplemental Wages
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Tax
- Tax Credits
- Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
- Tax Implications
- Tax Reform Act
- Teenage Labor
- Temporary Employee
- Temporary Help Agency
- Temporary Rule
- Temporary Schedule Change
- Temporary Workers
- Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals
- Termination
- Texas
- Texas Workforce Commission (TWC)
- Texting
- Third Circuit Court of Appeals
- Time Clock
- Time Records
- Tipped workers
- Title IX
- Title VII
- Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
- Tort Liability
- Trade Secrets
- Training
- Trans
- Transgender Rights
- Transitioning
- Transportation Industry
- Travel Time
- Trial
- Trump
- Trump Administration
- U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
- U.S. Department of Labor
- Undergraduate Students
- Underrepresented Community
- Undocumented Workers
- Undue Hardship
- Unemployment
- Unemployment Benefits
- Unemployment Insurance Program Letter
- Unfair Labor Practice
- Union Dues
- Union Organizing
- Union Relations Privilege
- Unions
- Unit Clarification Petition
- Unlawful Employment Practice
- Unpaid Leave
- Unpaid Wages
- USCIS
- USERRA
- vacation
- Vacation Accrual
- Vacation Pay
- Vacation Policy
- Vaccination
- Vaccine Requirement
- VEBA
- Verdict
- Vested Rights
- Veteran Services
- Vicarious Liability
- Victims
- Violent Crime
- Virginia
- Voluntary
- Volunteer Programs
- Volunteering
- Volunteers
- Wage and Hour
- Wage Order 7
- Wage Order 9
- Wage Theft
- Wage Transparency
- Wages
- Waiting Period
- Waiver
- warehouse
- WARN Act
- Webinar
- Wellness
- Wellness Program Incentives
- Wellness Programs
- Westchester County
- WFEA
- Whistleblower
- White House
- Whole Foods
- Willful and Repeat
- Wis. Stat. ch. 102
- Wisconsin
- Wisconsin Court of Appeals
- Wisconsin Fair Employment Act
- Wisconsin's Wage Payment and Collection Laws
- Withdrawal Liability
- Withholdings
- Witness Statements
- Work Eligibility
- Work Permits
- Work Restriction
- Work Schedules
- Worker Classification
- Workers' Compensation
- Working Conditions
- Workplace Accommodation
- Workplace Bullying
- Workplace Discrimination
- Workplace Disputes
- Workplace Injury
- Workplace Injury Reporting
- workplace inspections
- Workplace Policies
- Workplace Rules
- Workplace Safety
- Workplace Training
- Wright Line
- written release procedures
- Wrongful Termination