Lessons for Employers in the Case of a Former Google Software Engineer Fired for Violating Company Anti-Discrimination Policies
Earlier this week, an NLRB attorney issued an advice memo concluding that software giant Google did not violate Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA"), when the company terminated software engineer James Damore, who penned a controversial memo criticizing Google’s diversity initiatives. The memo, and Google's swift reaction, were widely covered in the press and speculation followed questioning whether Google's response was appropriate or whether it would face a challenge.
A challenge did follow in the form of a Section 7 charge before the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). Section 7 guarantees employees "the right to self-organization, to form, join, or assist labor organizations, to bargain collectively through representatives of their own choosing, and to engage in other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection." Under the Obama Administration, employers began to see an increased use of the NLRA and its Section 7 rights by employees as a means of challenging employment decisions, including terminations premised on policy violations. These challenges were often successful. Though the Google case (and the many other examples of employer action in the face of controversial employee social media posts) demonstrate the need for employers to exercise caution in determining whether and how they control those rights, this memo certainly gives employers more latitude in enforcing legitimate employment policies.
Let's begin with a brief refresher. While employed by Google, Damore, a white, male engineer, began to express concerns about Google's policies and initiatives on workplace diversity. He penned a memo in which he argued women were less likely to succeed as software engineers because they were "prone to neuroticism," had a lower ability to handle stress, and were less intelligent than men, among other sentiments. Damore's memo was widely disseminated through Google's chatroom platform. Colleagues complained about sexism and discrimination and reportedly two candidates for employment who learned of the memorandum withdrew their candidacy for employment because of it. Google viewed his actions contrary to its policy of providing an environment free from discrimination and harassment, placing Google in the position of having to respect Damore's potential Section 7 right to engage coworkers about the diversity policy, while at the same time enforcing its policies on discrimination and anti-harassment. Google terminated Damore, on the basis that his words violated the company's policy against discrimination and harassment, while steering clear of other arguably protected comments the engineer had made . The termination drew Damore's NLRB charge.
The case illustrates the challenge for employers when it comes to respecting an employee's Section 7 rights while also effectuating workplace policies. In the view of the NLRB, which was responding to a complaint filed by Damore, Google appropriately balanced Damore's Section 7 rights with its legitimate workplace rules and management prerogatives. While Section 7 did entitle Damore to question Google's diversity plan to boost minority employment, the company was also entitled to enforce its anti-discrimination and anti-harassment policies, as required under Title VII. Specifically, the NLRB attorney concluded that "[e]mployers must be permitted to 'nip in the bud' the kinds of employee conduct that could lead to a 'hostile workplace,' rather than waiting until an actionable hostile workplace has been created before taking action." The core of Damore's message did not promote the general or common good of the workforce. Nor did it speak to Google's workplace diversity initiatives. In Section 7 parlance, he was not seeking to provide or contribute to the mutual aid or protection of his fellow employees.
There are two important lessons that employers can take away from the Google case.
First, an employer must use care when disciplining an employee based on speech that it does not like. An employer cannot terminate an employee because he or she complained about a company policy, benefits, compensation and the like. Communications between employees that address mutual concerns about the workplace are typically protected speech. Employers must assess which side of the Section 7 line the speech in question falls before taking any action against the employee. That is why an employer must take care when drawing up social media and electronic communication policies. That same care must be taken if discipline is considered for employee speech.
Second, an employer must be alert to its workforce and concerns that raise questions of potential discrimination and harassment in violation of its own policies. When presented with facts that suggest there is an underlying problem (here, sexual stereotyping and broadcasting of same, among others), the company should investigate and take action to address violations of its EEO and anti-harassment policies.
Topics
- #12Days
- #MeToo
- 100% Healed Policy
- 10th Circuit Court of Appeals
- 11th Circuit Court of Appeals
- 17200
- 1st Amendment
- 1st Circuit Court of Appeals
- 2015 Inflation Adjustment Act
- 2018 Withholding Tables
- 24-Hour Shifts
- 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals
- 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals
- 42 U.S.C. s. 1981
- 42 U.S.C. ยง 12203(b)
- 42 USC 1983
- 4th Circuit Court of Appeals
- 5th Circuit Court of Appeals
- 62 USC 623
- 6th Circuit Court of Appeals
- 7th Circuit Court of Appeals
- 8th Circuit Court of Appeals
- 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
- A.A.R.P. vs. U.S. E.E.O.C.
- AB 1008
- AB 749
- ACA
- Accommodation
- accomodate
- ADA
- ADA Interference
- ADA Litigation
- ADAAA
- ADEA
- Administration
- Administrative Exemption
- Administrative Warrant
- Adverse Employment Action
- Affirmative Action
- Affordable Care Act
- Age Discrimination
- Age Discrimination in Employment Act
- Age-Based Harassment
- Agreements
- AHCA
- Aiding and Abetting
- Ambulance Attendant
- AMD
- American Health Care Act
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Amusement Parks
- Annual Summary
- Anti-Discrimination Policy
- Anti-Harassment
- Anti-Harassment Policy
- Anti-Retaliation Rule
- Anxiety
- Arbitration
- Arbitration Agreement
- Arrest Record
- At-Will Employment
- Attorney Fees
- Attorney General Guidance
- Audit
- Automobile Sales Exemption
- Back Pay
- Background Checks
- Ban the Box
- Bankruptcy
- Bankruptcy Code
- Bargaining
- Bargaining Unit
- Baseball
- Belmont CA Minimum Wage
- Benefits
- Bereavement
- Biometric Information
- Biometric Information Privacy Act
- Black Lives Matter
- Blocking Charge Policy
- Board of Directors
- Borello Test
- Breastfeeding
- Browning-Ferris
- Burden of Proof
- Burden Shifting
- CAFA
- California
- California Court of Appeal
- California Department of Fair Employment and Housing
- California Employment
- California Fair Employment and Housing Act
- California Family Rights Act
- California Labor Code
- California Labor Code s. 226.2
- California Labor Code s. 230.1
- California Labor Code Section 1197.5
- California Legislature
- California Minimum Wage
- California Senate Bill 826
- California Supreme Court
- Caps
- Case Updates
- Cat's Paw
- CFAA
- Chicago Minimum Wage
- Child Labor Laws
- Childbirth
- Choice of Law
- Church Plans
- Circuit Split
- City of Los Angeles CA Minimum Wage
- Civil Rights
- Claim for Compensation
- Class Action
- Class Action Waiver
- Class Arbitration
- Class Certification
- Class Waiver
- Code of Conduct
- Collective Action
- Collective Bargaining
- Collective Bargaining Agreements
- Collective Bargaining Freedom Act
- Committee on Special Education
- common law
- Commuting Time
- Comparable Work
- Compensable Time
- Compensation History
- Complaints
- Compliance Audit
- Computer Exemption
- Confidential Information
- Confidentiality Agreement
- Constructive Discharge
- Consular Report of Birth Abroad
- Contraception Services
- Contraceptive
- Contracts Clause
- Conviction Record
- Convincing Mosaic
- Cook County
- Cook County Minimum Wage
- Corporate Board
- Corporations
- Criminal Conviction
- Criminal History
- CSE
- Customer Service
- D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals
- DACA
- Damages
- Deaf
- Defamation
- Defendant Trade Secrets Act of 2016
- Delaware
- Department of Homeland Security
- Department of Economic Opportunity
- Department of Justice
- Department of Labor
- Department of Workforce Development
- Designation Notice
- Direct and Immediate
- Disability
- Disability & Medical Leave
- Disability Discrimination
- Disability-Based Harassment
- Disciplinary Decisions
- Discrimination
- Discrimination and Harassment
- Disparaging
- Disparate Impact
- Disparate Treatment
- District of Columbia
- Diversity
- Diversity Policy
- Documentation
- Dodd-Frank
- Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
- DOJ
- DOL
- Domestic Violence
- DOT
- Drug Free Workplace Act
- Drug Free Workplace Policies
- Drug Testing
- Dues
- Duluth
- DWD
- E-Verify
- EAP Exemption
- Earned Sick and Safe time
- Eavesdropping
- Education
- EEO Laws
- EEO-1
- EEOC
- El Cerrito CA Minimum Wage
- Election
- Electronic Communication Policy
- Electronic Communications
- Electronic Reporting
- Eleventh Circuit
- Emeryville CA Minimum Wage
- Emotional Distress
- Employee
- Employee Benefits
- Employee Handbook
- Employee Termination
- Employer
- Employer Health Care Plans
- Employer Mandate
- Employer Policies
- Employer Policy
- Employer Sponsored
- Employer-Employee Relationship
- Employment
- Employment Contract
- Employment Verification
- Enterprise Coverage
- EPA
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Equal Pay Act
- Equal Pay for Equal Work
- Equal Protection
- Equality
- ERISA
- ERISA section 4(b)(2)
- Essential Employment Terms
- Essential Functions
- ESST
- Estoppel
- Ethnic Equality
- Evidentiary Burdens
- Exclusive Remedy
- Executive Exemption
- Executive Order
- Exempt Employee
- Exempt Status
- Exemption
- Exhaustion of Remedies
- Experience
- Expert
- Expression of Milk
- Extreme or Outrageous
- FAA
- Failure to Accomodate
- Fair Credit Reporting Act
- Fair Employment and Housing Act
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Fair Pay
- Fair Reading
- Fair Workweek Law
- Fair Workweek laws
- Fairfax Memo
- Family Medical Leave Act
- family planning
- Fast Food
- FCRA
- Federal
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Federal Contracts
- Federal Government
- Federal Register
- FEHA
- fertility
- FICA
- Fiduciary
- Fiduciary Duty
- Fiduciary Rule
- Fifth Circuit
- Final Rule
- Fines
- fingerprints
- First Amendment
- Fitness-For-Duty
- Florida
- Florida Civil Rights Act
- FLSA
- FLSA Exemptions
- Flu Shot
- FMCSA
- FMLA
- FMLA Abuse
- FMLA Interference
- Form 300A
- Forum-Selection Clause
- Fourteenth Amendment
- Franchisee
- Franchising
- Franchisor
- Fraud
- Freedom of Speech
- Full-time hours
- garden leave clause
- Gay Rights
- Gender Bias
- Gender Discrimination
- Gender Equality
- Gender Identity
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Gender Identity-Based Harassment
- Gender Nonconformity
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act
- Georgia
- Gig Economy
- Gig Worker
- GINA
- Goods vs. Materials
- Graduate Students
- Grievances
- Grocers
- Gross
- H-1B
- Hair Discrimination
- Handicap Discrimination
- Harassment
- Hawkins-Slater Medical Marijuana Act
- Health Care
- Health Care Employers
- Health Care Provider
- Health Insurance
- HHS
- Highly Compensated Employees
- HIPAA
- Hiring
- Hiring Policy
- Hiring Practices
- HIV
- Hostile Work Environment
- Hour Tracking
- Hours Worked
- HR
- Human Trafficking
- Hybrand
- I-9
- IDHR
- IEP
- Illinois
- Illinois Department of Human Rights
- Illinois Human Rights Act
- Illinois Minimum Wage Law
- Illinois Nursing Mothers in the Workplace Act
- Illinois One Day Off In Seven Act
- Illinois Supreme Court
- Immigration
- Impaired
- Impairment
- Incentives
- inclusion
- Income Tax
- Independent Contractor v. Employee
- Independent Contractors
- Indiana
- Individualized Education Program
- informed consent
- Injuctive Relief
- Injunction
- Injuries
- Injury and Illness Reporting
- Interactive Process
- Interference
- Intermittent Leave
- Internal Applicants
- Internal Complaints
- Internal Revenue Service
- Interns
- Internships
- Investigation
- Iraq
- Iris Scans
- IRS
- IRS Notice 1036
- ISERRA
- Jefferson Standard
- Job Applicant
- Job Classification
- Job Classification Audit
- Job Descriptions
- Joint Control
- Joint Employer Test
- Joint Employers
- Joint Employment
- Judicial Estoppel
- Klever v. Carefusion
- LAB s. 226.2
- Labor
- Labor and Employment
- Labor Code
- Labor Dispute
- Labor Organizing
- Las Vegas
- lateral transfer
- Layoff
- Leased Employee
- Leave
- Ledbetter Act
- Legislation
- Lesbian Rights
- LGBTQ
- LGBTQ Rights
- LMRA
- Local Ordinance
- Los Angeles County CA Minimum Wage
- Loss of Consortium
- M.G.L. Chapter 151B
- Major League Baseball
- major life activity
- Malibu CA Minimum Wage
- Mandatory
- Mandatory Arbitration
- Manufacturers
- Marijuana
- Marital Discrimination
- Maryland Minimum Wage
- Massachusetts
- Massachusetts Equal Pay Act
- Massachusetts Pregnant Workers Fairness Act
- Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
- Massachusetts Wage Act
- Maternity Leave
- McDonnell Douglas
- Meal & Rest Break
- Meal Breaks
- Meal Period
- Media Mention
- Medical Condition
- Medical Examination
- Medical History
- Medical Marijuana
- MEPA
- MHRA
- Michigan
- Micro-Units
- Military
- Military Duty
- Milpitas CA Minimum Wage
- Minimum Wage
- Ministerial Exception
- Minneapolis Minimum Wage
- Minneapolis Sick and Safe Time ordinance
- Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Minnesota
- Minnesota Court of Appeals
- Minnesota Human Rights Act
- Minor Employees
- Minors
- Misappropriation
- Misclassification
- Missouri
- MLB
- Montana Human Rights Act
- Montgomery County Maryland Minimum Wage
- Mount Lemon Fire District v. Guido
- MSHA
- Multiple Sclerosis
- Municipalities
- Narrow Construction
- National Football League
- National Labor Relations Act
- National Labor Relations Board
- National Origin Discrimination
- Natural Hair
- Nebraska
- Negligence
- New Jersey
- New Jersey Compassionate Use Medical Marijuana Act
- New Jersey Law Against Discrimination
- New Moms
- New York
- New York Average Weekly Wage
- New York City
- New York City Human Rights Law
- New York Labor Law
- New York Legislation
- New York Paid Family Leave
- New York State Human Rights Law
- News
- NFL
- NJ Paid Sick Leave Law
- NJDOL
- NJLAD
- NLRA
- NLRB
- No Rehire Provisions
- Non-Compete
- non-competition agreement
- Non-Employee Union Agents
- Non-Supervisory Employees
- nonproductive time
- Notice
- Notice of Proposed Rule Making
- NPRM
- Nursing Mothers
- NY State Department of Taxation
- NYSHRL
- Obama Administration
- ObamaCare
- Obesity
- Objectively Offensive
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- OFCCP
- Off-Duty Rest
- Off-the-Clock
- Office of Management and Budget
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Older Workers
- OMB
- On-Call Scheduling
- Only When Rule
- Opinion
- Opinion Letter
- Opposition
- Oregon Minimum Wage
- OSHA
- Other-than-Serious Violation
- Outside Applicants
- Outside Sales Exemption
- Overtime
- OWBPA
- PAGA
- Paid Leave
- Paid Sick Leave Law
- Paid Sick Time
- Paid Time Off
- Parental Leave
- part-time hours
- Partnership
- Pasadena CA Minimum Wage
- Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act of 2009
- Pay Data
- Pay Equity
- Pay Gap
- Pay History
- Pay Inquiries
- Payroll
- Payroll Taxes
- PDA
- Penalties
- Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act
- Pennsylvania Wage Payment and Collection Law
- Pension
- Pension Plans
- Perceived Disability
- Permanent Replacement Employees
- Personnel Record
- PFL
- Physiological Condition
- Picket
- Piece-rate
- Policies
- Policy
- Political Affiliation
- Political Discrimination
- Politics
- Polygraph
- Portland Maine Minimum Wage
- Posting Requirements
- Preemption
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Pregnancy Discrimination Act
- Pregnant Worker Protections
- Premium Wage
- President Obama
- Presidential Election
- Pretext
- Preventative Care
- Privacy
- Private Colleges and Universities
- Private Employers
- Private Property
- Professional Exemption
- Property Rights
- Proposed Rulemaking
- Protected Activity
- Protected Class
- Protected Concerted Activity
- Protected Speech
- PTO
- PTSD
- Public Employers
- Public Records
- Publicly-Held Corporations
- Punitive Damages
- qualified individual
- Quid Pro Quo
- Race Discrimination
- Racial Discrimination
- Racial Equality
- Racial Harassment
- Reasonable Accomodation
- Recess Appointment
- Reduction in Force
- Regarded As
- Rehabilitation Act
- Religion
- Religious Discrimination
- Religiously Affiliated Employers
- Removal
- Reporting
- Reporting Time Pay
- Reproductive Health
- Republican
- Request for Information
- Respondeat Superior
- Rest Breaks
- Rest Period
- Restaurants
- Restrictions
- Retail
- Retaliation
- retaliatory termination
- Retina Scans
- Rhode Island
- RICO
- RIF
- Right to Control
- Right-to-Sue
- Right-to-Work
- Rounding Policy
- Safety Programs
- Salaried Employees
- Salary History
- Salary Inquiries
- Salary Inquiry
- Salary Test
- Salespersons
- San Francisco CA Minimum Wage
- San Francisco Parity in Pay Ordinance
- San Leandro CA Minimum Wage
- Sanctions
- Santa Monica CA Minimum Wage
- Sarbanes-Oxley Act
- SB 1300
- SB 1343
- SB 749
- SB 778
- SB 826
- SB1343
- SCA
- SCOTUS
- Seasonal Workers
- SEC
- Secretary of Labor
- Secretary Solis
- Section 1983
- Section 7
- Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act
- Section 8
- Securities & Exchange Commission
- Securities Fraud
- Self Evaluations
- Seperation
- Serious Health Condition
- Serious Violation
- Settlement Agreement
- Seventh Circuit
- Severance
- Severe and Pervasive
- Sex Discrimination
- Sex Stereotyping
- Sex-Based Harassment
- sexual and reproductive health decisions
- Sexual Assault
- Sexual Harassment
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Sexual Orientation-Based Harassment
- Shameless
- Short-Term Disability
- Sick Leave
- Similarly Situated
- Social Media
- Social Media Policy
- Social Security
- South Dakota
- SOX
- Split Shift Pay
- SSA
- St. Paul Sick and Safe Time Ordinance
- St. Paul, Minnesota
- Stalking
- Standing
- State Government
- State of Nevada v. US Department of Labor
- Statute of Limitations
- Statutory Exemption
- STD prevention
- Stock
- Street Trade Permits
- strike
- Student Loans
- Students
- Subjectively Offensive
- Subpoena
- Substantial Relationship
- Supervisor
- Supervisor Reassignment
- Supervisors
- Supervisory Employees
- Supplemental Wages
- Supreme Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Tax
- Tax Credits
- Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
- Tax Implications
- Tax Reform Act
- Teenage Labor
- Temporary Employee
- Temporary Help Agency
- Temporary Schedule Change
- Temporary Workers
- Termination
- Texas
- Texting
- Third Circuit
- Time Clock
- Time Records
- Tipped workers
- Title IX
- Title VII
- Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
- Title VII Retaliation; Faragher/Ellerth
- Tort Liability
- Trade Secrets
- Training
- Trans
- Transgender Rights
- Transitioning
- Transportation Industry
- Travel Time
- Trial
- Trump
- Trump Administration
- U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
- UCL
- Undergraduate Students
- Undocumented Workers
- Undue Hardship
- Unemployment
- Unfair Labor Practice
- Union Dues
- Union Organizing
- Union Relations Privilege
- Unions
- Unit Clarification Petition
- Unlawful Employment Practice
- Unpaid Leave
- Unpaid Wages
- USCIS
- USERRA
- vacation
- Vacation Accrual
- Vacation Pay
- Vacation Policy
- Vaccination
- Vaccine Requirement
- VEBA
- Verdict
- Vested Rights
- Vicarious Liability
- Virginia
- Voluntary
- Volunteer Programs
- Volunteering
- Volunteers
- Wage and Hour
- Wage Order 7
- Wage Order 9
- Wages
- Waiting Period
- WARN
- Webinar
- Wellness
- Wellness Program Incentives
- Wellness Programs
- WFEA
- Whistleblower
- White House
- Willful and Repeat
- Wis. Stat. ch. 102
- Wisconsin
- Wisconsin Court of Appeals
- Wisconsin Fair Employment Act
- Withholdings
- Witness Statements
- Work Permits
- Work Restriction
- Work Schedules
- Workers Compensation
- Workplace Bullying
- Workplace Discrimination
- Workplace Disputes
- Workplace Injury
- Workplace Injury Reporting
- Workplace Policies
- Workplace Rules
- Workplace Training
- written release procedures
- Wrongful Termination
- Zarda v. Altitude Express